|

|
Screveton Church
By Rev. J. Standish.
In his additions to Thoroton, in 1790, John Throsby speaks of this church
as dedicated to St. Winifred. This dedication would be unique in the
diocese. I take St. Winifred to be a mistake for St. Wilfrid. St. Winifred
is a British saint of the 7th century, whose life and legend are intimately
connected with Holywell, in Flintshire. While St. Winifred is not in any
way connected with Nottinghamshire, the intimate association of St. Wilfrid
with this county may be gathered from the number of churches dedicated
to him. These are Kelham, Calverton, Kingston-on-Soar, Kirkby-in-Ashfield,
Marnham, North Muskham, South Muskham, Scrooby, Wilford, and Screveton.
Throsby no doubt obtained his information from Ecton’s Thesaurus. Pre-Reformation
wills kept at York give St. Wilfrid.1
History explains the frequency of these dedications in Nottinghamshire.
In 664 Wilfrid took a prominent part in the conference at Whitby, and
was afterwards nominated to the See of York. He was contemporary with
Theodore of Canterbury, and was brought, more than once, into unpleasant
relations with that great primate. This led to Wilfrid being kept, at
different times, out of his See of York; but he was a man of immense energy,
and during these periods twice visited Mercia, doing great missionary
work and founding many religious houses. He died at Oundle in Northamptonshire,
in the year 709, having been one of the most remarkable of English churchmen,
and a man of wonderful activity, great resources, and conspicuous talents.
Dr. Bright tells us that with the death of Wilfrid closed a great period,”
and the period which succeeded was altogether inferior and adorned by
less splendid names.
There is one other point respecting this dedication. Screveton Feast
Day falls on the Sunday before St. Luke’s Day, the 18th of October. On
this reckoning, the Feast Day cannot be earlier than the 11th, nor later
than the 17th October. St. Wilfrid’s Day falls between these dates, namely
on October 12th; on the other hand St. Winifred’s Day is on the 3rd November.
Going briefly through the architecture of the church, you will find the
oldest parts to be these:—the arch on the north side of the chancel, the
easternmost lancet window on the south side of the chancel, the beautiful
font under the tower, and the north arcade.
The arch, on the north side of the chancel, is of two orders of chamfers,
so obtusely pointed as to be almost semicircular, the pillars have the
plain pointed bowtell moulding, and the capitals have square abaci.
The two lancet windows, on the south side of the chancel, are without
any label mould, and the eastern one, untouched by later hands, must be
a very early window of its kind. The respond at the east end of the south
arcade has the cap and abacus mould carried round a square pier; but this
seems to be a restoration error. A somewhat similar idea has been carried
out on the respond at the east end of the north arcade.
 |
|
Font, Screveton Church.
|
The font is specially interesting. It possesses a beautiful arcade of
intersecting arches, with pillars that are practically disengaged from
the body of the font. Above the arcade, the rim of the font is adorned
with leaf work and a continuous piece of cable work, one strand of which
is enriched with the nail-head ornament. The arcading runs closer on the
western side, and indicates that the mason has worked without any plan
or any preliminary striking, out of his design. At the ends of a diameter
of the font, running north and south, it should be noticed that the font
has been repaired by two pieces of new Roche stone, given by Lord Scarbrough
to the present rector. Apparently the font has possessed a lid, with hinge
at one side and hasp at the other.
Now what is the date of this font? About 1170 is the date generally given,
and it is spoken of as transitional Norman. But Rickman gives the date
as 1140 for the Ancaster font, and 1150 for the date of similar arcading
at Kelso, Scotland, We have examples of this arcading at Southwell, Peterborough,
Croyland, Lincoln, etc., not to mention a ruder form of it at Stanton-on-the-Wolds.
The text books regard this arcading as Norman, where it is not combined
with the lancet arch. There is similar arcade work, semicircular and intersecting,
on the west front of Lincoln Minster, the date of which lies within well-known
limits. It may be as early as 1123, and cannot be later than 1147. On
these grounds I am inclined to think that this Screveton font may well
be from thirty to forty years older than it is generally said to be.
The aisles of the nave have been rebuilt and their walls lowered, but
judging from the windows, which have been re-inserted, the north aisle
comes next in date after the chancel and the nave arcades. Its two three-light
windows, with intersecting mullions, belong to the earlier half of the
14th century, and are very early Decorated work. The windows at the east
and west ends of the north aisle have the hollow chamfer, and are probably
of the early Decorated period.
The arcades of the nave are Early English work. The bases on the north
side have a very early three-roll mould, and one on the south side the
later water-mould. The two square-headed windows of two lights each belong
to the late Decorated period, and are possibly fifty years later in date
than the arcades (i.e., circa 1380). There is half a similar window at
the west end of the south aisle, and at the east end, a still later insertion
in the shape of a small Perpendicular window of three lights. Between
the latter and the adjoining window of the south aisle, a piscina was
discovered during a restoration in the year 1884. The name of the chapel
which it implies is not known. Its basin is ornamented with a conventional
lily, of which the petals are disposed in a circle. It is late Decorated
work, I think, contemporary with the square-headed windows.
 |
|
Misericord, Screveton Church.
|
In the first volume of our Transactions, the writer on this church says
“ the tower was the last addition, late in the sixteenth century.” I cannot
reconcile myself to this statement, as the square-headed west window
of three lights, and the diagonal buttresses, and the moulding of the
string courses are marks of the Decorated period. The string moulding
is also found in Early English work.
The present fittings of the church are all modern, though the bench-ends
in the choir have been modelled on older work. The priest’s stall, on
the north side of the chancel, has an old miserere seat built into it,
worthy of inspection.
In 1881, the following work was done on the chancel:— Gable built up
with new coping and cross, new roof, new east window, and one new small
lancet window on south side. Blocked-up archway in north wall opened out
and new sacristy enclosing it and east window of north aisle of nave;
new buttresses, and walls repaired generally where required ; new floor,
of Minton tiles, with steps; new altar and rail; new oak stalls for two
priests and choir.
In 1884, the north and south walls of the aisles, and the east wall of
the south aisle were taken down and rebuilt from the foundations; the
heads of the windows re-inserted with new mullions throughout; new roofs
to nave and aisles, with red tiles; new door (made of old beams of nave
roof) on north side; new porch on south side, replacing dilapidated one
of red brick ; new buttresses throughout excepting tower buttresses ;
new coping and cross ; nave and aisles re-seated.
 |
|
Whalley Monument, Screveton Church.
|
The Whalley monument, now under the tower and formerly in the chancel,
must not be forgotten. In his recent book, Mr. John T. Godfrey gives an
accurate description and a good illustration of it.
The monument is a fine example of the splendid series of alabaster tombs
in this and other countries. Two articles on this subject, dealing with
the centre and extent of this industry, will be found in volumes X and
LXI of the Archaeological Journal. The papers are written by Mr. Richardson
and Mr. St. John Hope respectively. The trade from the Midlands with France
has been indicated in Mr. W. Stevenson’s paper in volume XI of our Transactions.
How far French examples may be English work can only be settled after
a minute comparison of many English and French examples. A small volume
published by the Lancashire Historic Society, on the Lydiate monuments,
near Liverpool, gives illustrations of the separate panels. I would suggest
the photographing of separate panels, as well as of complete monuments,
as a better means of comparison and as a fair way to some definite conclusion.
Under the tower you will also find part of a tomb, which came from the
south aisle (east end); part of a 15th century sepulchral slab, with incised
cross on it; and a stone on the window cill with some late 11th century
rope-work on it. Notice the old chest at the west end of the nave. It
is unusually long and has two compartments. The lid of the left hand compartment
has a slit in the centre of it, through which, centuries ago, many coins
must have been dropped. The chest has ironwork fittings, and has apparently
been worked out of one solid piece of wood; hence our use of the word
“trunk” in the sense of “a portable box or chest.”
In the churchyard, notice the sundial; also the old yew tree, which consists
of parent stem and daughter tree, the parent stem being shorn of its branches.
Not a few distinguished men have been more or less connected with Screveton,
and of these, notices of Richard Whalley, the politician, Robert Recorde,
the mathematician, Edward Whalley, the regicide, William Goffe, his son-in-law,
Manners-Sutton, Archbishop of Canterbury, and George Christopher Hopkinson,
the meteorologist and writer on education will be found in the Dictionary
of National Biography. The last two were formerly rectors of Screveton.
As parcel of the Duchy of Lancaster, the inhabitants of Screveton were
exempt from market and other tolls throughout the kingdom. As certificates
of exemption in connection with this feudal privilege are rare, Mr. T.
M. Blagg has kindly lent, for reproduction, his great-great-grandfather’s
certificate.
Before leaving Screveton, members had the privilege of seeing a number
of curios in the possession of Mrs. Bury. Besides the two already named,
as belonging to Margidunum, the following items were on view:—two bronze
kelts, a small iron axe, thought to be the top-piece of a helmet, a thurible,
a sacring bell without tongue and with suspension rings, an umbo of a
Danish shield, in a very crumbling state, a bottle stamp of wax, with
I.W. on it; none of which could be located. The remaining two large keys
were located ; the round handled one having been dug up in Screveton Churchyard
in 1881, and the ogee-handled one in Chapel Close, Bingham. The latter
possibly belonged to St. Helen’s Chapel, mentioned in Thoroton.
 |
 |
|
Two large keys.
|
Sacring bells.
|
|