|

|
Wollaton Hall, Church, and the Family of Willoughby (1)
by George Fellows.
The Hall.
 |
Wollaton Hall.
|
IN the first volume of the Society's Transactions (1897), the account
given of Wollaton Hall and Church was so brief that it is considered
some further description should be furnished.
It was on Wednesday, 28 July, 1897, that the members of the Thoroton
Society were, by the kind permission of Lord Middleton, afforded the
opportunity of inspecting this stately home of one of our oldest Nottinghamshire
families—the Willoughbys.
Before proceeding to a description of the house, it may be well to refer
to its surroundings.
The hall stands in a park, 790 acres in extent, which lies partly in
the county and partly in the city and county of Nottingham, and is completely
encompassed by a brick wall, said to be seven miles in circumference.
In this wall there are six entrances; the chief entrance lodge, erected
by Henry, sixth Baron Middleton, being at Lenton on the side nearest
the town of Nottingham, and about one and a half miles distant from the
city. The approach to the hall from this entrance is by a magnificent
avenue of lime trees. From whatever side, indeed, the house is approached,
it is at once evident with what discrimination the site was selected;
the elevation being a little over 200 feet above sea level, and the ground
falling away from the mansion on every side.
It may here be mentioned that years ago a village named Sutton Passeys,
all traces of which have long since disappeared, existed on the Radford
side of the park. Mention of this village is found in 1558,1 but
Thoroton (1677) tells us it "is now and long hath been totally decayed
and only known by the name of Wollaton Parke." According to the
Torre Manuscripts, there were two manors here, one held by the Morteyns;
the other by the Passeys, by sergeanty of finding a horse and sack in
the army of Wales; there was also a church or chapel connected with the
place. Many fine oak trees are studded about the park, some of which
may very probably have been planted by Sir Francis Willoughby at the
time the hall was built, and many of which are, alas, showing signs of
their antiquity. Until comparatively recent times, a herd of the British
wild white cattle was kept; this has been replaced by herds of both red
and fallow deer, in which the present Lord Middleton takes great interest.
Set in such surroundings stands this stately hall, the fine possession
of an ancient family and a salient feature in the landscape.
Although there are differences of opinion as to the merits of the hall
itself, there can be no dispute as to the claim of Sir Francis Willoughby
to the honour of having built and paid for this noble building. John
Thorpe, of Padua, is generally credited with being the designer, and
Robert Smythson, as his tablet in the church informs us, was the "architector
and surveyor," and died in 1614, aged 79; the master craftsmen were,
it is said, imported from Italy. Many and interesting must have been
the consultations between Sir Francis and these men whilst determining
upon the site and the design. The undertaking was entered upon in the
year 1580, and the work of building extended over a period of eight years,
as stated in an inscription over the garden entrance door, "En has
Francisci Willoughbaei aedes rara arte extructas Willoughbaeis relictas.
Inchoatae 1580 Finitas 1588."—Deering, p. 227. The stone of which
the mansion2 is built was conveyed from the Ancaster quarries,
in Lincolnshire, on the back of pack horses, which performed the return
journey laden with coal obtained on the estate; so, it is supposed, that
the material cost Sir Francis nothing. Nevertheless, it is stated by
Cassandra Willoughby, Duchess of Chandos, who wrote an account of the
house in 1702, that the whole outlay amounted to no less than £80,000, an
enormous sum of money in the days of Queen Elizabeth. Sir Francis originally
intended to build his hall in Warwickshire, and went so far as to lay
the foundations at Middleton, where traces are still shown in a wood
near to Middleton Hall. He chose far better, in setting the house on
its present site, as far as position goes.
The building is in the English Renaissance style, and is considered
to be a masterpiece of that class of work, the proportions of the central
tower and flanking turrets being beautifully designed and balanced. As
a rule, the structure elicits exclamations of admiration from those who
visit it, albeit some are found to depreciate it as being too ornate.
In 1864, the Rev. Edw. Trollope (subsequently suffragan Bishop of Nottingham),
an acknowledged authority on architectural matters, wrote a paper on
the hall.3 He says, "there is much for all to admire,
but perhaps still more for our professional and more observant members
to study." He calls attention to the distinction between the work
in the central and other parts of the building, "which differ entirely
from each other, in proportion, style, and ornamentation, as though Sir
Francis and his architect Smythson" (he quite ignores John Thorpe!) "could
come to no compromise as to the style they each wished to adopt." While
admitting that the central tower is indispensable, he considers it to
be of a weak Gothic character, with poor window tracery, a mean balustrade,
etc., and would have preferred that the bartizan corner turrets should
have sprung from corbels growing out of the angles. The remainder of
the hall finds greater favour with him. He considers the windows excellent,
as by their size they supply an abundance of light without detracting
from the solidity of the walls; certainly most will admit that the windows
here are not so aggressive (if that word may be allowed) as in the case
of Hardwick Hall built a few years earlier.
It has been conjectured by some that the central tower was an afterthought,
but John Thorpe's original drawings, which still exist in the Soane Museum,
set out the ground plan and half the front elevation, showing the tower
and inner walls of great thickness; so that such conjecture need scarcely
be further considered.
It was a few years previous to the commencement of this great undertaking,
that Sir Francis entertained Queen Elizabeth. At that time (21st July,
1575) his house was in the village of Wollaton, close to the church.
Traces of this house may still be seen. The queen caused a letter to
be sent him in advance, cautioning him to provide some good "beefs
and muttons," and to "consider how "his" provision
of drink may hold out."
Perhaps the finest views to be obtained of this imposing structure are
those of the south front from the steps leading to the rose garden, and
those of the north front, with its flight of balustraded steps leading
to the door, from the carriage approach. The plate of Wollaton Hall,
in Dr. Thoroton's History, would not satisfy either Sir Francis Willoughby
or John Thorpe, as it fails to do the beautiful poise of the building
justice. It does not represent the building as we see it now in some
particulars, more especially with respect to the front door and its approach;
but Sir Geoffrey Wyatt was employed to make, during the time of the sixth
Lord Middleton, some alterations, and these changes may have been amongst
them.
The exterior walls contain numerous niches and circlets, in which are
busts or statues of poets, etc. (it is said that there are 198 of these
in various positions!). These, together with the carved cornices, give
a great richness to the building, and it must be admitted that from whatever
point the house may be viewed, it is most imposing and fascinating; massive,
without being heavy, especially when a bright sunshine reveals and brings
into relief all the details of the building with its fine proportions
outlined against the sky.
When the Royal Archaeological Institute visited Nottingham in 1901,
a paper on Wollaton Hall was read by J. A. Gotch, Esq., F.S.A. In this
he states, "the chief credit for that performance" (i.e., the
design) "I am inclined to give to John Thorpe, and I reconcile his
claims and those of Robert Smythson by regarding the latter as the chief
workman and clerk of the works or surveyor;" he points out that
although there are several discrepancies between Thorpe's plans in the
Soane Museum and the actual building, the main idea and conception of
the scheme are shown in these plans, and the general likeness between
them is obvious. Mr. Gotch further refutes the theory, which has been
asserted by some, that the central tower was of older date than the flanking
towers, He says "a study of the plan and of the building, however,
disposes of this suggestion, nor could the lofty hall and the room over
it be harmonised with any known treatment of houses prior to the Elizabethan
era."
In the interior, the central hall, having its gallery carried on a stone
screen and an open-timber roof, is the most noticeable feature. It measures
sixty by thirty feet (the exact dimensions shown on John Thorpe's drawings),
and is no less than fifty feet in height! In spite of its size and loftiness,
and the fact that the windows are some thirty feet above the floor level,
it has the feeling of being most habitable, cheerful, and warm. Out of
this hall open numerous doors leading to the various apartments; also
to the armoury, where are still preserved the weapons that were in readiness
to defend the hall against the reform rioters in 1831. The incendiary
designs of these ruffians were frustrated by the Wollaton troop of yeomanry,
then chiefly composed of Lord Middleton's tenantry, who met and dispersed
the mob at a spot where subsequently the Beeston Lodge was erected. Above
this central hall is the "Prospect" room, of approximately
corresponding dimensions, the access to which is by a narrow stair. There
are two double chief staircases; the ceilings of both and the walls of
one being decorated with mythological paintings.
The house contains many pictures of value, including works by Snyder
and other famous artists, as well as interesting portraits of the Willoughby
family, together with coats of arms with numerous quarterings and impalements,
showing the many families with which the generations of Willoughbys have,
from time to time, allied themselves.
There is an interesting oilpainting by Sibrechts (1695), which hangs
in the large hall, representing the place in the days of William and
Mary, when the house was apparently surrounded by formally laid out gardens
of large extent.
<Previous | Next>
|